I get all this data off an excel spreadsheet that queries
yahoo finance (I really wish I had access to a Bloomberg), and I forgot to save
last week’s. Hopefully there are no
transcription errors here. I wish I had
a better index to use. Neither of those
two ETFs I use are ideal, and Yahoo doesn’t seem to have all the S&P
subindexes. I can find some but not
others. Ideally I would be using the
S&P 500, energy, E&P sub-sub index.
Overall it was a strong week for the market, and for most of
the diversified E&Ps. People
generally assume that the price of oil is likely to fall somewhat, or at least
that it shouldn’t go higher. This is
reflected in the futures market.
I know this chart is barely readable; it was a photo taken
of a Bloomberg screen at the free Bloomberg terminals in the NY Business
library. The white line is a WTI futures
curve from four years ago, the blue from three, then the red from two, the
light green from two, and finally the pinkish white (the one that starts at the
highest point) from last week. What each
of these lines represents is the futures contract at intervals going 10 years
into the future. The key observation
here is that in each passing year the expectation of future prices far in the
future has decreased. So even though the
spot price now is higher than in the past four
years (on that specific date) the future price for five years out has
gone down each time. There have been a
lot of issues with WTI because of the oversupply in the midcontinent (WTI is
priced in Cushing Oklahoma), but the same basic trend also exists for Brent
crude, the more relevant global benchmark now.
Overall for the week, the diversified larger E&Ps did
well, along with the Bakken names.
Permian companies were generally flattish and the Marcellus companies
were down with natural gas.
No comments:
Post a Comment